Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lawyer jailed in divorce battle is released after 14 years

Joann Loviglio
Sunday 12 July 2009 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A lawyer has been released from prison after serving 14 years for contempt of court because he refused to hand over millions of dollars in a bitter divorce battle.

It was the longest imprisonment on a civil contempt charge in US history, and prompted dozens of appeals to county, state and federal courts, twice reaching the US Supreme Court.

H Beatty Chadwick, now 73, was jailed in April 1995, accused of hiding $2.5m (£1.5m) from his ex-wife during divorce proceedings. Chadwick maintained he lost the money in bad investments. In 2006, before the economic downturn, experts estimated the money would be worth more than $8m.

Chadwick was released by Delaware County Judge Joseph Cronin, who decided that his continued incarceration had lost its coercive effect and would not result in him handing over the money.

Chadwick insisted on Friday that he was unable to pay the money and said there should be time limits on jailing people for contempt. He added: "If I had been convicted of murder in the third degree in Pennsylvania, I would have been out in half the time I was in jail."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in