Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

LA may return $78m beachfront property to descendants of Black family after taking it nearly 100 years ago

The property was stolen from the family in the 1920’s

Graig Graziosi
Monday 08 March 2021 18:18 GMT
Comments
Beaches on the Pacific Ocean lie empty after Los Angeles issued a stay-at-home order and closed beaches and state parks, as the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues, in Manhattan Beach, California, U.S., April 2, 2020. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson
Beaches on the Pacific Ocean lie empty after Los Angeles issued a stay-at-home order and closed beaches and state parks, as the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues, in Manhattan Beach, California, U.S., April 2, 2020. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson (REUTERS)

Los Angeles County may return beachfront property worth up to $75m to the descendants of the site's original owners, the first Black landowners in Manhattan Beach, California.

KABC-TV reported that the property - originally owned by Willia and Charles Bruce - was taken by the county using eminent domain laws in 1924.

When Mr and Ms Bruce owned the building, it served as a beach resort for Black families, who faced dangers during travel due to racism and discrimination.

According to NBC Los Angeles, LA County Supervisor Janice Hahn said she wanted the county to make amends.

"The property that was once the Bruce's is now owned by the County, and I want LA County to be part of righting this wrong," she said. "I am looking at everything from repurposing the property in a way that tells the history of Bruce's Beach to actually giving the property back to the descendants of Charles and Willa Bruce."

The family eventually received a small settlement for their property.

A lifeguard station is currently erected on the property.

The family's living descendant, Anthony Bruce, condemned the city for what it did to his ancestors, and wonders how his family's history may have been different if they had been allowed to keep the property.

"It was a wrong against the Bruce family," he said. "I think we would be wealthy Americans still living there in California ... Manhattan Beach, probably."

Kavon Ward, a resident of the community who decries the injustice done to the Bruce family, said the decision by the county to take the land may have stripped them of generations of wealth security.

"They need to pay for the stripping of generational wealth," he said. "This family could have been wealthy, they could have passed on wealth to other family members. Manhattan Beach could have been more culturally diverse ... there would have been more black people here."

The Los Angeles City Council is awaiting the results of a task force examining potential reparations for the Bruce family descendants.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in