Parler dealt major blow in attempt to come back online as judge rules Amazon does not have to restore it
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Amazon does not have restore service for controversial social network Parler, a judge has ruled.
The ruling was "not a close call", the judge said, and Amazon will not have to provide the web hosting services that it cut off in the wake of the attacks on the Capitol.
US District Judge Barbara Rothstein in Seattle said she was not dismissing Parler's "substantive underlying claims" against Amazon, but said it had fallen short in demonstrating the need for an injunction forcing it back online.
Amazon removed Parler, an app favoured by followers of former President Donald Trump, from its web hosting service on 11 January.
In court filings, it said the suspension was a "last resort" to block Parler from harbouring violent plans to disrupt the presidential transition.
The technology giant said Parler had shown an "unwillingness and inability" to remove a slew of dangerous posts that called for the rape, torture and assassination of politicians, tech executives and many others.
The social media app, a magnet for the far right, sued to get back online, arguing that Amazon Web Services (AWS) had breached its contract and abused its market power.
It said Mr Trump was likely on the brink of joining the platform, following a wave of his followers who flocked to the app after Twitter and Facebook expelled him after the assault on the US Capitol on 6 January.
Mrs Rothstein said she rejected "any suggestion that the public interest favours requiring AWS to host the incendiary speech that the record shows some of Parler's users have engaged in."
She also criticised Parler for providing "only faint and factually inaccurate speculation" about Amazon and Twitter colluding with one another to shut Parler down.
Parler said on Thursday it was disappointed by the ruling but remains confident it will "ultimately prevail in the main case," which it says will have "broad implications for our pluralistic society".
Parler chief executive John Matze had asserted in a court filing that Parler's abrupt shutdown was motivated at least partly by "a desire to deny President Trump a platform on any large social-media service".
Amazon denied its move to pull the plug on Parler had anything to do with political animus. It claimed that Parler had breached its business agreement "by hosting content advocating violence and failing to timely take that content down".
Parler was formed in May 2018, according to Nevada business records, with what co-founder Rebekah Mercer, a prominent Trump backer and conservative donor, later described as the goal of creating "a neutral platform for free speech" away from "the tyranny and hubris of our tech overlords".
Amazon said the company signed up for its cloud computing services about a month later, thereby agreeing to its rules against dangerous content.
Additional reporting by agencies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments