Judge in New Jersey repeatedly asks rape victim if she ‘closed her legs’
'This conduct constitutes a significant departure from the courtroom demeanour expected'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A judge could face a months-long suspension after repeatedly questioning a female rape victim about what she did to prevent her assault during a case in 2016.
A judicial conduct advisory committee reprimanded Superior Court Judge John Russo for the “egregious” remarks he made three years ago, in which he asked a woman: “Do you know how to stop somebody from having interpose with you?”
“Close your legs?” he continued. “Call the police? Did you do any of those things?”
The judge also repeatedly asked whether the victim attempted to “block” the assailant.
The advisory committee found the New Jersey judge displayed behaviour that was “not only discourteous and inappropriate, but also egregious given the potential for those questions to re-victimize the plaintiff”.
The committee recommended a suspension for the judge spanning three months without pay.
The judge should also be forced to receive training on “appropriate courtroom demeanour,” the committee wrote in its review.
“This conduct constitutes a significant departure from the courtroom demeanour expected of jurists and impugns [the judge’s] integrity and most notably that of the judiciary,” the committee added.
The woman being questioned by the judge was seeking a restraining order against the father of her child, who she claimed had raped her.
The judge told the committee he was asking about her response to the attack as part of an effort to “demonstrate the element of force or coercion used during the assault”.
He added that he was attempting to “aid the plaintiff in recounting a traumatic event”.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments