Judge overturns ban on 'evil' Harry Potter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federaljudge has ruled that the Harry Potter books be made available again to pupils in Arkansas after rejecting claims that tales of wizards and spells could harm children.
The Cedarville School District angeredfree speech groups and families after it ruled that students required parental permission to check out the books following a complaint by a parent.
The books by J K Rowling have been assailed by some Christian groups in the US for their themes of witchcraft. The American Library Association says the books were the most frequently challenged last year, but rarely did those challenges lead to restrictions or bans.
The plaintiffs, Billy and Mary Nell Counts, said they feared their daughter, Dakota, who is of primary-school age, would be stigmatised if she were identified as someone who read books the district considered "evil". First Amendment associations and the children's author Judy Blume filed a brief in support of the couple last month. They claimed the Cedarville district was committing censorship and trampling on students' right to receive information. They won the ruling from the US District Judge Jimm Larry Hendren.
"Everybody is just thrilled with the decision," the plaintiffs' lawyer, Brian Meadors, said.
The three board members who voted for the restrictions felt that the Harry Potter books, which portray the adventures of a young wizard, prompted children to disobey authority and carried occult messages.
Scholastic, which publishes books for schools, said its Harry Potter series taught children about right and wrong. "We're proud to publish the Harry Potter books," a spokeswoman said. "We think they're about good and evil, and we don't believe in censorship."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments