Jodi Arias trial: Murderer spared death penalty after jury unable to agree on punishment
Arias now faces life imprisonment - either with or without the chance of parole
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
A young woman found guilty of murdering her boyfriend in a case marked by tawdry details and cable television obsession, has been spared the death after a jury could not agree on her punishment.
Jodi Arias was found guilty of murdering her lover, Travis Alexander, in a 2013 trial which heard how she had stabbed him 30 times, slit his throat and left his body in the shower. At the time, a jury was unable to agree on whether she should be jailed for life or else sentenced to death.
As a result, a judge ordered a second trial to determine the punishment alone. But on Thursday, that jury also announced it could not agree on her punishment.
As a result, Arias will now be sentenced to life in jail without the chance of parole or else imprisonment with the chance of release after 25 years. A judge will announce the sentence on 13 April.
The Associated Press said that members of Mr Alexander’s family wept when the judge said jurors could not reach a decision. They sobbed as they left the courtroom in Arizona, with one covering her eyes as she walked out.
Attorney Jay Beckstead issued a statement from Mr Alexander’s brothers and sisters. It said: “We are saddened by the jury’s inability to reach a decision on the death penalty, however, we understand the difficulty of the decision, and have nothing but respect for the jury's time.”
Prosecutors say Arias killed Mr Alexander as revenge because he wanted to date other women and was planning a trip to Mexico with his latest love interest.
Her lawyer, Kirk Nurmi, told jurors that Arias deserves a second chance because she was the victim of verbal and physical abuse throughout her life.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments