Jamal Khashoggi's fiancee and pro-democracy group sue Saudi crown prince for his 2018 murder
Suit will cite writer’s work in Washington as part of wider conspiracy and reason for US jurisdiction of case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Jamal Khashoggi’s fiancee and the human rights group he founded have filed a federal lawsuit in Washington, DC accusing the Saudi crown prince of ordering the death of the journalist.
The Washington Post reports that Hatice Cengiz and Democracy for the Arab World Now (Dawn) allege in the suit that Mr Khashoggi was tortured, murdered, and dismembered “pursuant to a directive of defendant Mohammed bin Salman”.
Two dozen co-defendants are named alongside the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia.
It is claimed they saw Mr Khashoggi’s work in the US as “an existential threat to their pecuniary and other interests and, accordingly, conspired to commit the heinous acts that are the subject of this suit”.
The purpose of the suit is to have a US court hold the crown prince liable for the murder of Mr Khashoggi and to obtain documents in both countries that reveal the truth, attorneys Keith Harper and Faisal Gill told reporters.
The Saudi crown prince has previously denied any involvement in the killing of Mr Khashoggi at the country’s consulate in Istanbul in 2018. The Washington Post writer had been highly critical of the Saudi regime.
Officials have claimed that it was a tragic accident on the part of rogue agents who were supposed to persuade the exiled dissident and pro-democracy activist to return to Saudi Arabia.
However, the CIA concluded that the crown prince had ordering the killing.
Mr Khashoggi was killed on 2 October 2018 while visiting the consulate to obtain documents to permit him to marry Ms Cengiz.
There was widespread anger and international condemnation when the Turkish government revealed that he had been killed and dismembered.
Ms Cengiz and Dawn are represented by law firm Jenner & Block.
Attorneys argue that the crown prince is neither head of state nor the head of government and therefore not immune from prosecution in civil suits in the US.
The lawsuit must first establish that Mr Khashoggi’s work in the US is part of the wider conspiracy that led to his death in order to establish that a US judge has jurisdiction.
Saudi Arabia sentenced eight people to prison terms of between seven and 20 years for the killing of the journalist after a trial that human rights groups say lacked transparency.
Donald Tump boasted to journalist Bob Woodward that he protected the Saudi crown prince from US scrutiny after the murder of Mr Khashoggi.
“I was able to get Congress to leave him alone. I was able to get them to stop,” he told Mr Woodward in early 2020.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments