Judge rejects Hunter Biden’s appeal on gun charges ahead of June trial
The president’s son faces allegations he lied about his drug use during a 2018 gun purchase
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Hunter Biden’s efforts to have gun charges against him thrown out have been rejected by a federal appeals court in Delaware.
The decision, made by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday, cited “lack of appellate jurisdiction” and paves the way for a trial to begin next month. The president’s son faces allegations he lied about his drug use during a 2018 gun purchase.
“The defendant in this criminal case appealed three pre-trial orders entered on April 12, 2024, denying his motions to dismiss the indictment,” the court document obtained by Fox News stated. “This appeal is dismissed because the defendant has not shown the District Court’s orders are appealable before final judgment.”
According to Thursday’s ruling by district judge Maryellen Norieka, the trial is set to begin on 3 June.
Mr Biden’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, has suggested that he may ask the full Philadelphia-based Third Circuit to rehear the appeal, according to CNN. “In reviewing the panel’s decision, we believe the issues involved are too important and further review of our request is appropriate,” Mr Lowell said.
Last month, Ms Norieka dismissed a separate appeal by Mr Biden’s team, in which they had challenged both the case and the authority of special counsel David Weiss to bring it.
Mr Biden filed a number of challenges to the case, arguing he was still protected under an immunity agreement from a failed plea deal, as well as claiming that the prosecution was politically motivated, though these were dismissed.
“At best, [Hunter Biden] has generically alleged that individuals from the prior administration were or are targeting him (or his father) and therefore his prosecution here must be vindictive,” Ms Norieka wrote in an April ruling.
“The problem with this argument is that the charging decision at issue was made during this administration – by special counsel Weiss – at a time when the head of the executive branch prosecuting [the] defendant is [the] defendant’s father.”
Mr Biden’s defence team had argued last year that the president’s son was “selectively charged” and that the special counsel “buckled under political pressure” from GOP figures seeking political gain, including Donald Trump.
In January, Mr Weiss’s office called the Biden legal strategy “stunningly weak and wholly unsupported by facts and law”, comparing it to “a fiction designed for a Hollywood script”.
Also in April, challenges to a nine-count tax case against Mr Biden were dismissed by a California judge.
In both the tax and gun cases, Mr Biden has pleaded not guilty.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments