Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

FBI search warrant that may have cost Clinton election set to be reviewed

Huma Abedin says she and her husband were not shown the warrant to search their email server

Nate Raymond
Friday 16 December 2016 14:56 GMT
Comments
Huma Abedin has claimed the FBI did not show her the warrant to search her and her estranged husband's emails
Huma Abedin has claimed the FBI did not show her the warrant to search her and her estranged husband's emails (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Huma Abedin, the longtime aide to Hillary Clinton, has asked a US judge to allow her to review a search warrant the FBI used to gain access to emails related to Clinton's private server shortly before the presidential election.

In a letter filed in Manhattan federal court, Ms Abedin said she was never provided a copy of the warrant, nor was her estranged husband, former Democratic US Representative Anthony Weiner, whose computer contained the emails in question.

The letter was filed as a federal judge considers whether to unseal the application for the search warrant, which was obtained after FBI Director James Comey informed Congress of newly discovered emails on 28 October.

Mr Comey's letter drew new attention to a damaging issue for Ms Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, and shook up the campaign 11 days before the election won by Republican Donald Trump.

US District Judge Kevin Castel had invited affected parties to weigh in on the potential release of the search warrant application, which is being sought by Los Angeles-based lawyer Randol Schoenberg.

In their letter, Ms Abedin's lawyers said she was unable to evaluate the issue as neither she nor Mr Weiner was provided the warrant itself, despite federal rules requiring authorities to provide a warrant to a person whose property was taken.

Lawyers for Ms Clinton and Mr Weiner did not immediately respond to requests for comment, nor did the US Justice Department.

Ms Clinton used the server while she was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. Mr Comey in July had recommended to the Justice Department that no criminal charges be brought against Clinton over her handing of classified information in the emails, although saying she and her colleagues were "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

In his October letter to Congress, Mr Comey said emails potentially related to the Ms Clinton server probe had been discovered in an "unrelated case."

Sources close to the investigation have said the emails were discovered during an unrelated probe into Mr Weiner following a media report that he engaged in sexually explicit phone and online messages with a 15-year-old girl.

Federal investigators got a warrant to examine the emails to see if they were related to the probe into Ms Clinton's private server. Only two days before the election, Mr Comey disclosed that the emails did nothing to change his earlier recommendation.

Reuters

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in