Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Heather Hironimus: Mother fighting to stop child's circumcision appears in court in Florida

Friends say mother is simply doing what she can to protect a child who is 'scared to death' of the procedure

Matt Sedensky
Tuesday 19 May 2015 01:29 BST
Comments
Heather Hironimus argues the circumcision of her son “will permanently and irreversibly mutilate” him
Heather Hironimus argues the circumcision of her son “will permanently and irreversibly mutilate” him (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The long-running court battle of a Florida woman who went on the run with her son to avoid his circumcision reached court with a judge questioning her right to the legal challenge.

US District Judge Kenneth Marra reacted with scepticism to the case put by the boy’s mother, Heather Hironimus, “Aren’t you really asking me to revisit and second-guess?” Marra said near the start of the 80-minute hearing in West Palm Beach.

The mother went missing with the boy nearly three months ago and, it is claimed, ignored a judge’s warnings that if she failed to appear in court and give consent for the circumcision to proceed, she faced jail.

In a last attempt to stop the case, Thomas Hunker, who is representing Ms Hironimus, had submitted a motion for a restraining order against Ms Hironimus’ father. Ms Hironimus argues circumcision “will permanently and irreversibly mutilate” her son and brings the risk of “permanent brain damage or death”.

Though Marra made no ruling, he was often incredulous as Ms Hironimus’ attorney, Thomas Hunker, contended the case could continue in federal court because it was filed on behalf of the boy.

Mr Hunker said the child’s interests were not fully and fairly represented in state court and that the boy had the right to make his own wishes known.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in