Harvey Weinstein’s lawyers claim rape trial is ‘a circus’ after Gigi Hadid expelled as juror
Five jurors have been selected in the case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Harvey Weinstein‘s lawyers have asked for his trial to be moved out of New York City once more, claiming the case has turned into a “media and entertainment circus”.
The former movie mogul’s defence team went to court on Thursday with a last-minute demand to halt jury selection and relocate the proceedings. A previous venue change request was denied in October.
They allege that intense media coverage, protestors and even the consideration of supermodel Gigi Hadid as a juror have turned the case into a “circus”, publicity-wise.
Weinstein’s lawyers made their case hours after Hadid was dismissed from the jury pool and as jurors were starting to be picked for the case.
By lunchtime Thursday, five jurors had been selected — three men and two women — from about 145 potential jurors who were invited back for additional questioning.
“The deluge of publicity adverse to Mr Weinstein has engulfed the potential jury pool resulting in untoward pressure upon jurors to convict a man demonised and prejudged guilty,” Weinstein’s lawyer Arthur Aidala wrote in court papers that spurred Thursday’s trip to the appellate court.
Prosecutors oppose moving the trial, pointing to the plethora of potential jurors still in the running after pledging they could be fair and impartial as evidence that the process is working. Moving to a smaller community with a smaller jury pool would only make it more difficult to find jurors, they added.
The appellate court did not immediately rule. The matter will go to a panel of judges with the aim of having a decision before opening statements, which could happen as early as next week.
Justice David Friedman, who heard Thursday’s arguments, declined a request from Weinstein’s lawyers to halt the trial until the panel rules.
Weinstein, 67, is charged with raping a woman in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013 and performing a forcible sex act on another in 2006. He has pleaded not guilty and denied any allegations of non-consensual sex.
If convicted on the most serious charges against him, Weinstein could face life in prison.
Additional reporting by agencies