Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Weinstein’s lawyers insist he isn’t using Zimmer frame for sympathy in court after he is seen shopping without it

Pictures emerge of disgraced film producer walking unaided day after using walker for bail hearing

Chiara Giordano
Saturday 14 December 2019 16:42 GMT
Comments
Harvey Weinstein arrives at court using a walking frame

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Harvey Weinstein’s lawyers have insisted he is not using a Zimmer frame to win public sympathy, after he was photographed walking without one.

The disgraced film producer was filmed hunched over a four-legged walking frame as he slowly pushed himself into a courthouse in New York for a bail hearing on Wednesday.

The 67-year-old’s lawyer, Donna Rotunno, told CNN at the time that his legal team had encouraged him to use a walker ahead of a scheduled back surgery on Thursday.

She added: “Mr Weinstein didn’t want the press to think he was seeking sympathy.”

However on Thursday, pictures emerged of him walking unaided around a supermarket near his New York home.

According to the New York Post’s Page Six website, an undercover reporter spotted the former producer in the Target store in Mount Kisco with his family.

In response, a representative for Mr Weinstein told the site that he underwent a three-hour operation on Thursday for an injury he sustained during a car crash in August – however they reportedly did not offer an explanation for his sporadic use of a walking frame.

They said: “He had a bilateral laminectomy and is now recovering, and will be remaining one night in the hospital.”

Mr Weinstein is due to go on trial on 6 January on rape and sexual assault charges.

(Getty Images)
(Getty Images) (Getty)

He has pleaded not guilty to charges he raped a woman in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013 and performed a forcible sex act on a different woman in 2006.

A judge increased his bail from $1m (£750,000) to $5m (£3.7m) on Wednesday over allegations he mishandled or disabled his electronic ankle monitor on 57 occasions in less than two months.

Later that day, a lawyer revealed that a $25m (£19m) settlement had been reached for more than two dozen actresses and former employees who claim Mr Weinstein sexually harassed them.

Mr Weinstein is already on his third set of defence lawyers, after parting ways with more than half a dozen.

In an interview with The Guardian on Saturday, one of those lawyers, Lisa Bloom, said she deeply regretted working for him.

Actress Rose McGowan is suing Ms Bloom, along with Mr Weinstein, lawyer David Boies and private intelligence agency Black Cube, after alleging the group coordinated to shut down her claims that Mr Weinstein raped her in 1997 at the Sundance Film Festival.

A book published by the New York Times reporters who broke the story about Mr Weinstein includes a memo written by Ms Bloom to Mr Weinstein in 2016 which details a six-point plan to damage Ms McGowan’s reputation.

Ms Bloom told The Guardian: “All I can tell you, in regards to that memo, is virtually none of those things happened.

“Everything in that memo, if I did say it, I certainly don’t believe now.”

The lawyer, who has previously referred to working for Mr Weinstein as a “colossal mistake”, added: “Attorneys represent a lot of distasteful people.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in