Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Guantanamo Britons challenge their detention

Helen Johnstone
Saturday 03 July 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Two Britons are among nine detainees who are to challenge the legality of the American government holding them at Guantanamo Bay, a lawyer confirmed last night.

The cases, filed in the US District Court in Washington, are the first to be reported since the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that nearly 600 detainees held at the US naval base in Cuba had the right to contest their captivity in the American courts.

The detainees include two Britons, Moazzam Begg, from Birmingham, and Feroz Abbasi, from Croydon. The others are Jamil El-Banna, a Palestinian, and Bisher Al-Rawi, an Iraqi, both of whom were formerly British residents, and three French citizens, a German Turk and a Canadian.

The habeas corpus petitions demand that the US government explain in court why they are being held.

Jeffrey Fogel, the legal director of the Centre for Constitutional Rights in New York, which has taken up their cases, said: "This is the beginning of trying to enforce precisely what the Supreme Court mandated as a way to obtain justice. The first step is that the government has to respond."

He said the petitions were filed by lawyers from various law firms working in conjunction with the Centre for Constitutional Rights.

The lawyers had not been able to meet any detainees in Cuba, Mr Fogel said, but they had authorisation from prisoners' families. However, it was not immediately clear last night how the courts would respond to the requests for hearings.

The Guantanamo detainees are being held on suspicion of links to al-Qa'ida or the fallen Taliban regime of Afghanistan. But defence lawyers argue that some had little or no connection with the war in Afghanistan.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in