Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Google says sorry for racist image of Michelle

Guy Adams
Thursday 26 November 2009 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Google has suffered a blow to its reputation as a champion of liberalism after it inadvertently helped a racist picture of Michelle Obama become one of the most viewed images on the internet.

The search engine apologised for providing an "upsetting experience" to users of Google Images after searches for America's First Lady brought up a shot in which Mrs Obama's face had been crudely altered to look like that of a monkey.

The offensive picture had initially been posted last October on an obscure blog called Hot Girls. For months, it went largely ignored. But after a handful of angry rival bloggers linked their site to the image, it began slowly creeping up Google's rankings.

On Tuesday, it suddenly hit number one and attracted media attention. Faced with a snowballing PR problem, which pitted its commitment to free speech against the leftish values it supposedly espouses, Google was forced to debate whether it should "de-list" the image.

The firm eventually decided not to, arguing that freedom of speech is also the freedom to offend. Instead, it carried a notice on its search page explaining that sites it links to "do not necessarily reflect" the company's views.

"It's offensive to many people," admitted the California-based company's spokesman Scott Rubin. "But that alone is not a reason to remove it from our search index. We have, in general, a bias toward free speech."

Cynics noted that Google was not so high-minded when it entered the lucrative Chinese market, agreeing to a government demand to block local access to the sites of foreign media organisations, and severely restricting searches for words like "democracy" or images of the Tiananmen Square massacre

Google's discomfort was eased somewhat yesterday when the offending image of Mrs Obama was removed from the Hot Girls site, and as a result finally disappeared from Google search results.

In its place, on the blog, was a garbled apology, apparently translated from Chinese, saying: "Do not the subject of race and politics make the discussion too radical and sincere hope that the world is very peaceful [sic]."

The affair has nonetheless highlighted the tricky position Google increasingly finds itself in when its searches, which scour through databases according to complex algorithms without human intervention, give prominence to images or messages that are widely seen as offensive.

The problem is a growing one. In an unrelated incident in Milan, Italian prosecutors yesterday called for Google executives to be jailed for enabling a video in which four youths from the city of Turin taunt and humiliate a young man suffering from Down's Syndrome to be posted on a Google-owned Italian website.

The chief prosecutor in the case, Alfredo Robledo, told the court: "The protection of fundamental rights cannot be trampled merely on the basis of the rights of a company."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in