Freddie Gray death: Many Americans - especially young people - unimpressed with media coverage of Baltimore riots
Survey suggests young people wanted less coverage of unrest and more of peaceful protests that preceded it
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lot of Americans – young people in particular – were not impressed with the way the media reported the recent unrest in Baltimore following the death of Freddie Gray.
They believe the media spent too much time covering the sporadic, limited riots and devoted too little time to the days of peaceful protests that had preceded the unrest.
A new survey by the Pew Research Centre suggests that 48 per cent of people considered the coverage was only “fair” or “poor”, while 44 per cent said it was “excellent” or “good”.
“While some attention was paid to Baltimore in the days immediately after Freddie Gray’s death, the awareness of what was happening in the city really exploded after rioting broke out in the city last week,” says the report.
“The governor declared a state of emergency and activated the National Guard, while the mayor announced a citywide curfew.”
The disgruntlement is even more striking among young Americans.
Pew said that people aged under 30, rated the news organisations’ coverage the most negatively.
Around 30 per cent said news organisations did a poor job and another 34 per cent thought it was fair. Just 30 per cent said the media did an excellent or god job. By contrast, adults aged 50 and older were more likely to say the press did an excellent or good job.
The survey found that a large share of adults aged 18-29 thought news organisations covered the non-violent protests too little (56 per cent) and just 13 per cent though there has been too much coverage of them.
Meanwhile, most adults 65 and older thought, coverage of the non-violence has been the right amount (39 per cent) or too much (34 per cent). Only 17 per cent thought there was too little coverage of that aspect of the events.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments