Father loses custody battle for daughters after ex-wife marries sex offender
Judges divided amid fears girls could be 'at risk' with new stepfather
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A father of two teenage girls has lost a lengthy legal battle to get custody of his children after his ex-wife married a registered sex offender.
The divorcee took legal action saying he feared his girls may fall prey to the convicted criminal, who served four years in prison in 2003.
He was jailed for the attempted sexual abuse of his then 15-year-old stepdaughter from a previous marriage.
The case has been dragged through the court system in Nebraska, US, until the state Supreme Court upheld the lower courts’ rulings, finally ending the father’s legal challenge.
Previously, a Phelps County District judge ruled there was no significant risk to the pair.
Refusing to accept the decision, the father, who has not been named, took his fight to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, which sided with the earlier judge, concluding the teenagers were not in danger.
But he fought on for custody of his children, taking his battle to the Supreme Court judges.
There, a divided court upheld the ruling with a four-justice majority, with two justices finding in favour of the father.
One of the two, Justice William Connolly, wrote a letter criticising his peers' decision.
Retiring earlier this month, he wrote: “It leaves the noncustodial father, who is willing and able to care for his children, feeling helpless to protect his children.”
As reported in the Journal Star, he said the stepfather should undergo an independent evaluation to assess if the girls were at risk.
And Justice Lindsey Miller-Lerman also came down in favour of giving the father custody.
She found that the current circumstances were worrying similar to the original situation that led to the stepfather's conviction.
Nebraska law states there is a presumption that since the stepfather is a sex offender and has access to the girls, they are at risk.
But this can be overridden by the custodial parent, their mother, presenting evidence to the contrary.
The justices wrote: “If she presented such evidence, then the presumption disappeared and the district court, as trier of fact, was not required to find that [the stepfather] was a significant risk.”
In this case she submitted reports of her new husband’s rehabilitation, and pointed to the absence of any allegations of sexual offences since 2002.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments