Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg’s name should not be on San Francisco hospital, say local politicians
Medical facility ‘should not bear the name of a person responsible for endangering public health in our country,’ says supervisor
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Local government politicians in San Franciso on Thursday voted to condemn the naming of a hospital after Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
Three members of the city's board of supervisors argue that the San Francisco General Hospital should not be named after the tech billionaire and his wife, Priscilla Chan.
They claim Facebook endangers the health of people around the world and are calling for a better policy for the future naming of public facilities.
The resolution has no basis in law and is largely symbolic. The full board is expected to vote on the resolution on 15 December.
“San Francisco’s only public hospital should not bear the name of a person responsible for endangering public health in our country and around the world — and yet it does,” said Gordon Mar, the resolution's lead signatory.
“These are policy choices, and they have a body count.”
Mr Zuckerberg and Ms Chan donated $75 million to the San Francisco General Hospital, where Ms Chan worked as a paediatrician, in 2015.
As part of the gift process, the medical centre was officially renamed the Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center.
But since then, Facebook has come under increasing criticism for the way it conducts its business, perhaps most notably over the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
“We’re of course thankful for the gift and we’re thankful for any gift to our most important institutions during this time,” said Matt Haney, another supervisor supporting the condemnation.
“But that doesn’t mean that we should for forever essentially have given away advertising rights on this most essential public institution.”
Kim Meredith, the head of the hospital’s foundation, criticised the resolution, saying she was "proud" the hospital was named after Mr Zuckerberg and Ms Chan.
She said: “This resolution of condemnation on the naming of [the hospital] has the potential of unintended consequences and a chilling effect on past, present, and future gifts to the city.
“We will need philanthropies to continue to tackle the challenges of Covid-19, health equity, and recovery in future years.”
The Independent has contacted the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative for comment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments