Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Everyone a winner, or loser, in Iowa miscounts

David Usborne
Saturday 07 January 2012 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Nobody showed any interest in recounts after the photo-finish end to the Iowa caucuses last Tuesday when a final tally showed Mitt Romney beating Rick Santorum by just eight votes of the 122,000 cast.

Never mind that the scope for error in the caucus process, with voters scribbling names on scraps of paper, was substantial.

Then came the report from an Iowa TV station on Thursday that in one of the local precincts the number of votes attributed to Mr Romney, pictured, had been misreported. A supporter of Ron Paul, who helped in the counting in the Appanoose County precinct, told the station that Mr Romney had scored only two votes but was somehow awarded 22. Deduct the 20 he didn't really get and Mr Santorum would have won.

The state Republican party has said it is looking into what happened but in the meantime thinks it might have found another place where miscounting happened but where Mr Santorum appears to have been the beneficiary. That might explain why the latter was playing down the affair yesterday. "That really doesn't matter to me," he said. "This was a tie."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in