Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Doubt cast on video of 'extinct' woodpecker

Andrew Buncombe
Saturday 18 March 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Last spring, birdwatchers claimed they had proof that the ivory-billed woodpecker, believed to be extinct for 60 years, was still alive. While some birders doubted the bird's identity, others likened it to the discovery of the Holy Grail.

But now fresh doubt has been cast onto the sighting by America's most famous birdwatcher. David Sibley, author of The Sibley Guide to Birds, said he believes the bird on the video is a pileated woodpecker.

"Although we support efforts to find and protect ivory-billed woodpeckers, the video evidence does not demonstrate that the species persists in the United States," said an article published by Mr Sibley and others in yesterday's edition of the magazine Science.

But in the same edition of Science, another team of researchers defend the bird's identification. That team, headed by John Fitzpatrick of Cornell University's Laboratory of Ornithology, say Mr Sibley's analysis was "based on misrepresentations of a pileated's underwing pattern".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in