Donald Trump's 'largest tax cut in US history' claim shot down by Republican senator
Plan whose cost has halved since first announced is - at most - fifth-largest enacted, according to Iowa statesman Chuck Grassley, who took President to task on Twitter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.President Donald Trump is going around mischaracterising his tax plan as the largest tax cut in US history and a Republican senator is calling him out on it.
Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley tweeted on Thursday, as if speaking to Trump, “Ur tax cut will not be 'largest in history of country,'” and proceeded to offer a fact check “my own self.”
Grassley then laid out Bush-era tax cuts that were worth more, using nearly incomprehensible Twitterese.
A look at the matter:
"I'm giving the largest tax cuts in the history of this country,” Trump said on Tuesday after meeting Henry Kissinger.
The truth is that is tax plan is, at most, fifth-largest in its estimated cost, says Marc Goldwein, Senior Vice President and policy director at the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. It could well end up being even lower on the ladder historically.
The estimated cost of the tax plan has dropped by half or more since the spring, when only the contours were known.
In an analysis in April, Goldwein's group found that the $5.5 trillion plan that was then expected would have been the third largest since 1940 as a share of GDP, behind President Ronald Reagan's package in 1981 and tax cuts enacted in 1945 to phase out revenue generated for the Second World War.
But, citing estimated costs of $1.5 trillion to $2.5 trillion for Trump's plan now, Goldwein said several other historically significant tax cuts also would surpass Trump's: from 2013 and 1964.
Trump frequently overstates the size of his tax plan, though on some occasions he's called it one of the largest. Grassley tweeted on Thursday:
That statement is in the ballpark, if migraine-inducing.
Combining three rounds of tax cuts under Bush yields a package bigger than Trump's would be even if it tops out at $2.5 trillion. It's also conceivable that the first round of Bush tax cuts alone, worth over $1.3 trillion in 2001 dollars, would be bigger than Trump's package.
Grassley is “basically in the right,” Goldwein said.
Having worked to pass the Bush tax cuts as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Grassley wished to set the record straight.
But he went on to praise Trump's initiative, in his distinctive Twitter style, saying “regardless ur tax framework sets out badly needed cuts REFORM SIMPLIFICATION TO CREATE JOBS/ move byond ObamaSTAGNATION.”
AP
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments