Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Trump-Russia probe: Facebook called on to testify before Senate intelligence committee on election hacking

Social media giant 'seems to have been less than forthcoming' regarding targeted 'fake news' posts during campaign, argues Senator Richard Burr

Mary Clare Jalonick
Wednesday 20 September 2017 11:30 BST
Comments
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The chairman of the Senate intelligence committee says Facebook should testify as part of its probe into Russian meddling in the US election, and that the social media giant “seems to have been less than forthcoming” with Congress.

Senator Richard Burr, Republican-North Carolina, said on Tuesday that committee members agreed the panel should hold a public hearing after it was revealed earlier this month that hundreds of phony Facebook accounts, likely run from Russia, spent about $100,000 on ads aimed at stirring up divisive issues such as gun control and race relations during the 2016 campaign. The panel is one of several in Congress probing Russian interference and any connections to President Donald Trump's campaign.

“Facebook seems to have been less than forthcoming on potentially how they were used,” Burr said, adding that it's “just a question of when, and potentially the scope of what that hearing would be.”

Facebook has briefed members of Congress and also provided the ads and other information to Robert Mueller, the special counsel in charge of the Russia investigation, the company said. In all, the accounts purchased some 3,000 ads between June 2015 and May 2017. While the ads didn't specifically reference the election, a candidate or voting, they nevertheless allowed “divisive messages” to be amplified via the social media platform, the company's chief security officer, Alex Stamos, said in a statement 7 September.

In addition to the 470 accounts that appeared to be run from Russia, Stamos said its investigators also discovered an additional $50,000 in spending via 2,200 ads that “might have originated in Russia,” even including ads purchased by accounts with IP addresses in the US but set to Russian in the language settings.

Lawmakers have said they want to know more about the content of the ads pushed out by the Russian-based Internet Research Agency and whether they targeted specific voters or locations in the United States.

The company has come under intense pressure since the election to curb the flow of false information. After the election, it updated its advertising policy to say it wouldn't run spots that are “illegal, misleading or deceptive, which includes fake news.”

Burr said a hearing could likely involve Twitter and other social media companies as well. He said the panel hasn't yet issued any invitations, but a hearing would be this fall.

Asked if he expected Facebook to be open to a public hearing, Burr said the company has “expressed they don't have anything to hide, so a public hearing would be very appropriate.”

Facebook spokesman Andy Stone wouldn't comment on a hearing but said the company “continues to cooperate with the relevant investigative authorities.”

AP

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in