Donald Trump's Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin facing questions over missing analysis of Republican tax bill
Department's inspector general Eric Thorson investigating whether political considerations prompted representative to withhold breakdown of consequences from public and Congress
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Treasury Department’s inspector general is examining whether political considerations interfered with Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s promised analysis of the Republican tax proposal.
“It’s a top priority,” Rich Delmar, counsel to inspector general Eric Thorson, said Thursday in an email. Delmar said he could not provide a timeframe for when the inquiry would be complete because it would depend on how quickly the department’s official watchdog receives the information and “how complex issues are.”
In a letter early on Thursday, Senator Elizabeth Warren asked Thorson’s office to review whether Treasury resources were used to research the tax plan, and why no analysis has been released to the public or Congress. Mnuchin has repeatedly pledged that the Republican proposal would pay for itself through economic growth, and that his department would provide detailed analysis to support those statements.
But, with the Senate preparing to vote on the tax overhaul this week, Mnuchin has yet to deliver the analysis.
“Either the Treasury Department has used extensive taxpayer funds to conduct economic analyses that it refuses to release because those analyses would contradict the Treasury Secretary’s claims, or Secretary Mnuchin has grossly misled the public about the extent of the Treasury Department’s analysis,” Warren, a Democratic Senator from Massachusetts, wrote in the letter.
A Treasury spokeswoman didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
A new analysis released Thursday by the Joint Committee on Taxation found that the Senate tax bill would generate enough economic growth to lower its $1.4 trillion revenue cost by about $458 billion over a decade. That would leave a 10-year revenue loss of roughly $1 trillion, said the JCT, Congress’s official scorekeeper on tax legislation.
Mnuchin has promised “complete transparency” about the analysis and the tax plan’s economic benefits. However, in September, The Wall Street Journal reported that Treasury had removed from its website a 2012 research paper that contradicted the Trump administration’s stance on the wage growth expected from a corporate rate tax cut.
Warren, whose letter followed a New York Times report on Thursday that Treasury hadn’t completed the analysis Mnuchin had touted, asked the inspector general to review whether the department’s resources were used to undertake a tax plan analysis, if the research was conducted using Treasury standards and protocols, whether there was any political interference, and the reasons why findings weren’t released to the public or Congress.
“I’m glad @USTreasury’s IG responded quickly to my request,” Warren tweeted late Thursday.
Bloomberg
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments