Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Michael Flynn: More inconsistencies in work of Donald Trump's former national security adviser

Flynn Intel Group told the Justice Department in March the two $40,000 payments were consulting fees for unspecified work

Stephen Braun,Chad Day
Wednesday 10 May 2017 15:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

President Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, is at odds with a former Turkish client over two unusual payments totaling $80,000 that Flynn's firm sent back last year to the client. The disagreement highlights inconsistencies in Flynn's accounts to the government about his work for foreign interests.

Flynn Intel Group told the Justice Department in March the two $40,000 payments were consulting fees for unspecified work. Turkish businessman Ekim Alptekin tells The Associated Press the payments were refunds for unperformed lobbying.

The difference matters because Flynn's foreign relationships and the veracity of his disclosures are under scrutiny by government inquiries.

Flynn's Justice Department filing did not disclose a verbal agreement that Alptekin says guided those refunds.

Federal law requires disclosure of all written and verbal contracts and modifications.

AP

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in