Assistant district attorney leaves job after suggesting man cut out dog’s vocal cords in plea deal
‘I think singling us out for one dog is a little ridiculous,’ owner says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An assistant district attorney has left his job after he suggested that a dog owner get his pet’s vocal cords surgically altered to get noise complaint charges dropped.
The unnamed lawyer worked for Graham County in North Carolina when he suggested that Michael Eddings have the ability to bark surgically removed from his seven-year-old Great Pyrenees Leo.
Mr Eddings rejected the idea, blasting the suggestion as “crazy” and “inhumane”, WLOS reported.
On Friday, Graham County District Attorney Ashley Welch said that “I have confirmed that an assistant district attorney in my district suggested, as a possible solution to violations of a town’s noise ordinance, that a dog’s vocal cords be surgically altered. Whether offered in jest or seriousness, the suggestion was inappropriate. I am unable to offer additional comment as this is now a personnel matter”.
On Tuesday, Ms Welch said the lawyer no longer works for the county.
“I do not condone, support or approve of his suggestion,” she told WLOS.
It’s not clear if the lawyer was fired or if left the position of his own accord.
Leo’s barking was found to have violated a city noise ordinance on several occasions.
Mr Eddings told the local TV station that he was stunned by the plea deal offered by the assistant district attorney.
“He said that, ‘If you have the vocal cords removed surgically, they would drop all charges.’ It’s crazy! It is inhumane,” the dog owner said. “We’re willing to negotiate ... but I’m not going to put on a barking collar and I’m not going to have surgery.”
The process of removing dogs’ vocal cords is a controversial measure that’s illegal in some countries, including the UK. In the US, the legality of the measure depends on state-level laws. Animal welfare experts condemn the practice.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) spokesperson Catie Cryar told Newsweek that the measure is “cruel and unnecessary”.
The surgery puts dogs at risk of infection and scarring that can damage the airways. The dogs may also suffer emotional issues after their way of communicating is removed.
Mr Eddings told WLOS that “Leo’s bark does travel, but it’s just because he’s 120 pounds. I have a neighbour that has three or four dogs that bark. And my neighbour across the street has dogs that bark. So, I think singling us out for one dog is a little ridiculous”.
Graham County Sheriff Jerry Crisp has said that Mr Eddings has been issued multiple citations for noise violations following complaints from neighbours.
Mr Eddings said that so far, he has received more than $750 in citations and lawyer costs. His next court appearance has been scheduled for October.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments