Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Derek Chauvin trial: George Floyd told police ‘I can’t breathe’ 27 times as defendant accused of ‘betraying badge’

The case against Derek Chauvin, the most important civil rights trial in a generation, began on Monday in Minneapolis

Josh Marcus
San Francisco
Monday 29 March 2021 22:06 BST
Comments
‘Derek Chauvin betrayed this badge,’ prosecutor says
Leer en Español

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin “betrayed his badge” when he knelt on George Floyd’s neck for more than nine minutes as he was arresting him for using a counterfeit $20 bill, a jury has heard at the start of his murder trial.

Opening arguments began on Monday in the trial of the white former police officer charged with murdering an unarmed Black man, whose death inspired worldwide civil rights protests.

“You’re going to learn in this case a lot about what it means to be a public servant and to have the honour of wearing this badge,” prosecutor Jerry W. Blackwell told the court. “It’s a small badge that carries with it a large responsibility and a large accountably to the public.”

Jurors also watched a long section of video that a bystander shot of the arrest, where state attorneys said Mr Floyd pleaded over and over again—27 times in one form or another—that he couldn’t breathe, before losing consciousness and falling limp.

Read more:

“This case is not about all police, or all policing,” Mr Blackwell continued. “Police officers have difficult jobs. They have to make split-second decisions. They sometimes have split second life or death decisions.”

But, the prosecutor added, “This case is not about split-second decision making.”

Instead, the state plans to argue, Mr Chauvin went against common police training as he continued to pin Mr Floyd against the ground for 9 minutes and 29 seconds, even after he lost consciousness and paramedics arrived, arguing that officers have a duty of care towards suspects once they’re in custody, and care was “not a feeling” but “a verb.” It was this alleged lack of care, they’ll ultimately argue, that caused Mr Floyd’s death.

“When Mr Floyd was in distress, Mr Chauvin wouldn’t help him, didn’t help him,” he said. “You’re also going to see, he stopped everyone else from trying to help him.”

The state plans to call witnesses including bystanders, who can be heard in video yelling at officers to take Mr Floyd’s pulse and let him off the ground. One, Genevieve Hansen, is a Minneapolis firefighter who was on the scene that day.

Meanwhile, Mr Chauvin’s attorney, Eric Nelson, argued “there are always two sides of a story” and said the case will ultimately come down to concrete evidence of what happened and whether force was reasonable.

“There is no political or social cause in this court room,” he said. “But the evidence is far greater than 9 minutes and 29 seconds.”

According to the defence, Mr Chauvin used appropriate tactics after a drawn out arrest where Mr Floyd failed to comply with previous requests from officers.

“Derek Chauvin did exactly what he had been trained to do over his 19-year career,” Mr Nelson added. “The use of force is not attractive, but it is a necessary part of policing.”

The trial is being seen as a test to what extent the justice system prosecutes officers charged with grave misconduct, after numerous high-profile cases like it before have ended in non-convictions

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in