Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Air Force analyst who leaked drone data revealing civilian deaths jailed for 45 months

The documents revealed the extent of civilian deaths in US drone strikes, which were touted for their supposed accuracy.

Josh Marcus
San Francisco
Wednesday 28 July 2021 03:25 BST
Comments
U.S. drone strike kills AQAP leader in Yemen

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Daniel Hale, a former US Air Force intelligence analyst who helped leak information on the inner workings of the military’s controversial drone warfare programme, was sentenced to 45 months in prison on Tuesday.

The 33-year-old was indicted in 2019, after leaking documents including highly sought after information on how the military chooses its targets and the high numbers of civilians often accidentally killed using the supposedly precise method of warfare.

He told a judge in federal court in Virginia on Tuesday he chose to leak the documents to expose what he called "the lie that drone warfare keeps us safe, that our lives are worth more than theirs”.

“I am here because I stole something that was never mine to take — precious human life,” Hale said. “I couldn’t keep living in a world in which people pretend that things weren’t happening that were. Please, your honour, forgive me for taking papers instead of human lives.”

Since 2004, the US drone programme has killed between 9,000 and 17,000 people, according to various estimates, including potentially thousands of children and multiple US citizens, though accurate data is obscured by the government labelling casualties during drone strikes “enemies killed in action” unless proven otherwise.

“With drone warfare, sometimes nine out of 10 people killed are innocent,” Hale said on Tuesday. “You have to kill part of your conscience to do your job.”

Federal officials took a less idealistic view of Hale’s conduct. US district court judge Liam O’Grady, who presided over the trial, said the former analyst was “not being prosecuted for speaking out about the drone programme killing innocent people” and “could have been a whistleblower … without taking any of these documents.”

Meanwhile, assistant US attorney Gordon Kromberg wrote in a filing that the leaks had endangered national security.

“We do not know whether this information already has been or will be used in the future by terrorists or other foreign adversaries,” he said. “What we can be sure of is that Hale’s actions risked damage to the safety and security of Americans in the past, and will continue to do so in the future.

Officials implied that The Intercept, a news outlet focused on civil liberties and national security, received the leaked materials.

“Daniel Hale will spend years in prison for leaking documents that the government implied were published by The Intercept,” the outlet’s editor-in-chief Betsy Reed said in a statement on Tuesday.

“These documents revealed the truth about the US government’s secretive, murderous drone war, including that the killing of civilians was far more widespread than previously acknowledged. The Intercept will not comment on our sources. But whoever brought the documents in question to light undoubtedly served a noble public purpose.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in