Dallas shooting: Mayor says open carry laws made job tougher for police
As the shots rang out, open carry activists were incorrectly named as suspects
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In the wake of the tragic shooting in downtown Dallas that claimed the lives of five police officers, the city’s mayor criticised Texas’ open carry laws that he says made law enforcement’s job tougher as bullets rained down from rooftops.
“You know, in dealing with the law of gun holding, you can carry a rifle legally, and when you have gunfire going on, you usually go with the person that’s got a gun,” Dallas mayor Mike Rawlings said on CBS’ Face the Nation programme. “And so our police grabbed some of those individuals, took them to police headquarters, and worked it out and figured out that they were not the shooters.”
As the Dallas police scrambled to make sense of what was happening last week, they broadcast a photo of a “person of interest” – Mark Hughes, a black man in a camouflage T-shirt carrying a long rifle across his back.
Social media users quickly found video of Mr Hughes standing in the street, alongside other witnesses and fellow protesters, as the police were dealing with an active shooter situation. His friends immediately rushed to his defence and told press that he handed his apparently unloaded rifle to the nearest officer.
Mark Hughes was not the shooter.
[scald=4531426:sdl_editor_representation]
The Associated Press said Dallas police estimated about 20 or 30 open carry activists to be present at the 7 July demonstration. And in a scene where shots were ringing out and so many people were carrying firearms, law enforcement may have had trouble discerning who was a threat.
“But that is one of the real issues with the gun right issues that we face,” Mr Rawlings added, “that in the middle of a firefight, it’s hard to pick out the good guys and the bad guys.”
Dallas police chief David Brown expressed similar sentiments.
“Doesn’t make sense to us, that that’s their right in Texas,” Mr Brown told CNN. “For our officers, they were suspects. And I support that belief. Someone is shooting at you from a perched position, and people are running with AR-15s and camo gear and gas masks and bulletproof vests.
“They are suspects until we eliminate that.”
Beginning 1 January 2016, registered gun owners in Texas could begin carrying their firearm in the open without concealment, sparking ongoing debates as to the limits open carry has.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law a bill that allows registered gun owners to carry their weapons on college campuses – the University of Texas at Austin is set to comply with that law on 1 August 2016.
The law has met some resistance and raised significant concerns from educators at Texas schools. The University of Houston released a memo in February discouraging teachers from discussing “sensitive subjects” so as not to anger an armed student.
To President Barack Obama, the ubiquity of guns in Texas can only make matters worse, especially in an active shooter situation that Dallasites witnessed last Thursday.
“[Police] have a really difficult time in communities where they know guns are everywhere,” he said. “And as I said before, they have a right to come home, and now they have very little margin of error in terms of making decisions.
“So if you care about the safety of our police officers, then you can’t set aside the gun issue and pretend that that’s irrelevant.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.