Workers at meatpacking plant where 1,300 caught Covid threaten strike over new contracts
Employees say they faced high-risk conditions while factory remained open amid initial outbreak in 2020
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Workers at a meatpacking plant where nearly 1,300 employees caught coronavirus in an outbreak last year are threatening strike action over new contracts if their demands are not met.
Workers at Smithfield Foods pork processing plant in South Dakota have become emboldened over their dissatisfaction with their employment terms since the Covid pandemic hit.
Four workers died during a severe outbreak at the plant last year. Former President Donald Trump passed an executive order compelling meat plants to remain open under the Defence Production Act.
The union for the plant is now demanding that Smithfield boost its wage offerings amid other concessions such as employee health insurance costs in a four-year contract, or face a strike.
"We’re not going to change our stand," BJ Motley, the president of the local union, said.
A strike authorization at the Sioux Falls chapter of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) was overwhelmingly approved late on Monday with 98 per cent of the vote total, the union said.
Smithfield Foods, which is based in Virginia, has said its initial offer, which was rejected by the union last week, is in “full alignment” with agreements that UFCW has already accepted at other plants.
The company also said that it had outfitted plants with plexiglass safety barriers to prevent transmission and pointed out that after the plant reopened, large outbreaks were avoided.
Mark Lauritsen, the UFCW national vice president of meatpacking, said pay has increased significantly throughout the industry since the pandemic began in a bid to incentivise workers under risky conditions.
Most companies made those pay increases permanent last year, giving workers a couple more dollars per hour, Mr Lauritsen said.
The union wants Smithfield to match the starting rate of $19 an hour offered at a JBS pork plant 70 miles (110 kilometers) away in Worthington, Minnesota.
As workers fell ill amid the outbreak, the plant was forced to close, causing severe disruption to meat supplies across the country and highlighting the vulnerability of the meat supply chain.
An employee strike could have a similar ripple effect, as the plant produces roughly 5 per cent of the nation’s pork supply every day.
However, union leaders have said that they hope to avoid a work stoppage as they met with company representatives on Tuesday.
The Independent has contacted Smithfield for further comment.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments