Coronavirus: Justice department quietly requests right to detain someone indefinitely in raft of ‘emergency’ measures
New measures would allow government to request court proceedings be halted
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.As the response to the coronavirus pandemic dominates headlines in the US, the Department of Justice is seeking to greatly expand its powers of detention.
Politico reports that the Department of Justice is asking legislators to grant it new powers on everything from the statute of limitations to asylum claims and court hearings. With the Trump administration having already been challenged in the courts on its efforts to allow indefinite detention of immigrants who apply for asylum, the new measures – if passed into law by Congress – could open up a whole new set of legal battles.
The documents reportedly request permission for judges and administration officials to be able to suspend court rules during an emergency.
Under the rules, whenever a court is closed due to “any natural disaster, civil disobedience, or other emergency situation” – as may soon happen in parts of the US as the pandemic rages – the attorney general would be able to call an indefinite halt to court proceedings, meaning those awaiting trial would remain in detention until proceedings were restarted.
The coronavirus epidemic has already been declared a national emergency, and states including California had declared their own states of emergency before that.
After the Politico report, condemnation of the request came swiftly from both parties. On the Republican side, libertarian-minded Kentucky senator Rand Paul tweeted "We absolutely must, must, resist government run amok taking advantage of a crisis. This is how your liberty dies. Stand up America and resist." Utah senator Mike Lee wrote simply "OVER MY DEAD BODY".
And on the Democratic side, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was equally blunt. Tweeting the original Politico article, she wrote: "Absolutely not".
The issue of detention without charge or trial on national security grounds has been a running controversy since the Patriot Act was implicated after 9/11. A massive piece of legislation, it gave the government various new surveillance powers – and critics including the American Civil Liberties Union also said that section 412 of the act could allow indefinite detention of immigrants.
This section was never invoked until November 2019, when the Trump administration used it to prolong the detention of a Palestinian man whose sentence was about to expire.
The justice department’s requested measures would also allow the administration to place strict limits on who could apply for asylum in the US.
Not only would those testing positive for COVID-19 be blocked, but those “subject to a presidential proclamation suspending and limiting the entry of aliens into the United States” would also be barred. The administration has already begun denying all entry to illegal migrants crossing the US’s southern border regardless of whether they are applying for asylum or not.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments