‘You can’t make that make sense’: Supreme Court expert rails against Justice Clarence Thomas for potential conflict of interest
‘The appearance here is that the reason he dissented is because his wife Ginni Thomas is all up in January 6’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Supreme Court expert has lambasted Clarence Thomas over his refusal to recuse himself from politically charged cases which his wife has openly lobbied over.
Ginni Thomas, a longtime conservative activist, last week signed an open letter calling for the 6 January committee’s two Republican members to be ousted from the House GOP conference.
.@ElieNYC on #SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas-"When Thomas is the lone dissenter on these issues where his wife literally may be implicated in a plot to overthrow the government & the man doesn't recuse make that make sense. You can't make that make sense" #TheReidOut #reiders pic.twitter.com/ydRsvfZCVx
— The ReidOut (@thereidout) January 22, 2022
Her husband was the sole Supreme Court justice to vote against releasing Donald Trump’s White House documents about the riots at the US Capitol in an 8-1 decision on Thursday.
Supreme Court expert and journalist Elie Mystal told MSNBC’s The Reidout that Justice Thomas had a clear conflict of interest in the case.
“Maybe he dissented because Clarence Thomas’s entire brand is to be wrong all the time,” he said.
“But the appearance here is that the reason he dissented is because his wife Ginni Thomas is all up in January 6,” Mr Mystal, The Nation’s justice correspondent, said.
“You can’t make that make sense.”
Mr Mystal said Justice Thomas had repeatedly ruled on decisions that his wife had been involved in lobbying for or against.
“The other person that really deserves some blame here is John Roberts.
“He could also be in a position to censure or punish ClarenceThomas for his refusal to do the baseline moral character thing and recuse himself from situations where his wife might be literally implicated.”
In a new report for the New Yorker, Jane Mayer revealed Ginni Thomas’s lobbying firm Liberty Consulting had been paid more than $200,000 by the conservative pressure group Center for Security Policy in 2017 and 2018 that had filed an amicus brief with the Supreme Court in support of the Trump administration’s Muslim travel ban.
Justice Thomas voted to uphold the ban twice.
Ms Thomas also launched something called the Impact Awards four years ago to honour “courageous cultural warriors”.
“Many of the recipients have served on boards or committees with Ginni Thomas, and quite a few have had business in front of the Supreme Court, either filing amicus briefs or submitting petitions asking that the Justices hear cases,” Ms Mayer wrote.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments