California bans schools starting before 8.30am so youngsters can have more sleep

Teens told to enjoy a lie in as legislators outlaw mandatory early starts

Colin Drury
Sunday 02 September 2018 12:23 BST
Comments
California Governor Jerry Brown
California Governor Jerry Brown (Rich Pedroncelli/AP)

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas

Editor

It is a new law that would surely be a vote-winner, if only teenagers could vote.

Schools in California are to be banned from opening before 8.30am – so youngsters can enjoy a lie-in.

State legislators narrowly approved the proposals for all high and middle schools, saying evidence suggested that children who had longer in bed were healthier and more likely to graduate.

Supporters said research showed teenagers especially benefited from sleeping later: lower depression and anxiety rates, higher attainment and fewer car accidents have all been associated with school start times being pushed back in the US.

"This is the single most cost-effective thing we can do to improve high school graduation rates," said assemblyman Jay Obernolte.

Headteachers will have three years to introduce the new starting time once state governor Jerry Brown rubber stamps the bill.

At present, some 80 per cent of schools will need to change to comply, reports Fox News. Many may continue to offer earlier start times but as voluntary ‘extra’ periods, it has been suggested.

Opponents reckon local school boards, not the state, should determine start times

One, assemblyman Jose Medina, said: “When it comes to education, the farther away the decisions are made from the classroom, the worse those decisions are."

Another, Patrick O’Donnell argued: “We should not micromanage schools from Sacramento [the state capital]. Why have a school district if we are going to pass this bill? It will burden working families.”

The rule – which was previously turned down in 2017 – will not apply to rural schools.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in