California baker wins case after refusing to make wedding cake for gay couple
Bakersfield’s Tastries Bakery had been sued by the state’s Department of Fair Housing and Employment
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
A judge has ruled in favour of a California bakery owner who refused to make wedding cakes for a same-sex couple because she said it violated her religious beliefs.
Tastries Bakery in Bakersfield had been sued by the state’s Department of Fair Housing and Employment arguing that owner Cathy Miller violated the Unruh Civil Rights Act in discriminating against the couple.
Ms Miller’s lawyers had argued that her right to free speech and free expression of religion outweighed the legislation.
Kern County Superior Court Judge Eric Bradshaw ruled on Friday that Ms Miller had acted lawfully in sticking by her Christian beliefs in marriage.
“I’m hoping that in our community we can grow together,” Ms Miller told The Bakersfield Californian. “And we should understand that we shouldn’t push any agenda against anyone else.”
The couple, Eileen and Mireya Rodriguez-Del Rio, said they expected an appeal in the case.
“Of course, we’re disappointed, but not surprised. We anticipate that our appeal will have a different result,” Eileen Rodriguez-Del Rio told the newspaper.
A previous decision in Kern County Superior Court also went Ms Miller’s way but was eventually vacated by the 5th District Court of Appeal.
Ms Miller had refused to make a cake for the couple back in 2017 and referred them to another bakery.
The judge ruled that baking the cake was an “artistic expression” and was protected under the First Amendment.
“[The department] failed to prove that defendants intentionally discriminated against Eileen and Mireya because of their sexual orientation,” the judge ruled.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments