Blogger found guilty of defamation in test case
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The defamation conviction in Italy of the operator of a US-hosted blog has sent ripples of alarm through the global blogging community, raising fears over future censorship of blogsites in Italy and other countries.
In a sharply worded statement, the Paris-based press freedom organisation Reporters Without Borders said it seemed that the blogger Roberto Mancini "is being punished for his bad language and not because he posted false information, which is unacceptable". It added that Mr Mancini was also being held responsible for comments posted by readers, "a decision which goes against European legal jurisprudence".
Mr Mancini set up his blog Il Bolscevico Stanco (The Weary Bolshevik) in 2005, dealing with events in the Valle d'Aosta region in northern Italy. Using the pseudonym of General Sukhov, he wrote various articles attacking local figures in crude and sarcastic terms. Four people, including two journalists, had filed complaints for defamation, and Mr Mancini was ordered to pay $16,900 (£9,300) in fines and damages.
The General Sukhov columns were "certainly written in an extreme style", the press watchdog group said, "but the complainants were not able to show they were untrue".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments