Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

‘Just imagine the climate’: Bitcoin in crosshairs as Democrats target crypto mining in green energy push

Bitcoin mining demand for surplus green energy currently being wasted could fuel growth in renewables, say crypto advocates

Justin Vallejo
New York
Thursday 20 January 2022 19:12 GMT
Comments
How is Bitcoin fueling climate change?
Leer en Español

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Cryptocurrency leaders were called before Congress to defended Bitcoin as Democrats questioned how the energy-intensive mining was affecting President Joe Biden’s green energy agenda.

The Congressional hearing comes after the Environmental Protection Agency blocked two requests to use coal-fired power plants to power bitcoin mining operations.

Democrat Diana DeGette opened the hearing, “Cleaning Up Cryptocurrency: The Energy Impacts of Blockchains”, by saying there needs to be an overall focus on reducing carbon emissions and increasing green energy.

Her colleague, Frank Pallone, said the president’s commitment to carbon-free power by 2035, and a net-zero economy by 2050, couldn’t be met by mining energy-intensive cryptocurrencies with current or old fossil fuel plants.

“Energy required to process transactions on the bitcoin network could power a home for more than 70 days,” Mr Pallone said. “Last year there were hundreds of thousands of transactions on this network, and just imagine the climate implications.”

Brian Brooks, the current CEO of BirFury and former chief legal officer of Coinbase, told the hearing that cryptocurrency mining used 58 per cent of sustainably sourced power compared to 31 per cent for the US economy as a whole.

“What is clear is that the 188 terawatt-hours used by Bitcoin last year out of about 155,000 terawatt-hours consumed globally for all uses, was sourced more sustainably than other uses on average,” he said.

He added that bitcoin miners are better for the renewable energy industry by creating demand for otherwise underutilised energy, like the 1.5 million megawatt-hours wasted in California in 2020.

“Bitcoin miners seek low energy cost, and the lowest cost always comes from excess capacity, which can include wind and solar energy, and energy lost in the distribution process,” he said.

Steve Wright, a former general manager of Chelan County in Washington, suggested mining firms consider “mechanisms to assure cryptocurrency production is encouraged toward efficient outcomes”.

He said clean energy is gaining value in electricity markets while carbon-emitting generation is losing value, adding that appears “likely to push crypto production toward fossil-fired resources for at least the near term”.

John Belizaire, Chief Executive Officer Soluna Computing, said 30 per cent of solar and wind energy is wasted, which reduces the probability of renewable energy.

He said data centres absorb green energy that would otherwise go to waste, converting energy that would otherwise go unused into low-cost global computing while also protecting the energy network.

“Crypto’s energy consumption is a feature, not a bug,” he said.

“Our data centres are the catalyst for building a green plant that would otherwise not get built. Computing is a better battery, so computing is reading today to allow renewables to scale to their full potential.”

The committee raised concerns over the energy-intensive “proof of work” consensus mechanisms used to mine bitcoin, with Ms DeGett asking Mr Brooks if it is wasteful and whether cryptocurrencies could shift to the less energy-intensive “proof-of-stake” method used by competitors like Etherum.

“It’s clearly not wasted. It’s an asset that large numbers of people are willing to pay for,” he said, adding that proof-of-stake allows a majority shareholder to change the code, rewrite the ledger, and steal everybody’s money.

Cornell Tech Professor Ari Juels said that decentralized claims of bitcoin, however, was misguided,

“Bitcoin in effect, many blockchain systems, are in some key ways notably centralised,” he said. “In the specific case of Bitcoin, just four entities called mining pools control the majority of the mining power, and thus technically can control the whole system.”

Former acting assistant secretary of the US Treasury under President George W Bush, Gregory Zerzan, said inappropriate regulation could strangle the innovation of blockchain by

“Bitcoin is one cryptocurrency but not all cryptocurrencies are meant to be a cash substitute,” he said. “Cryptocurrency is simply the oil that lubricates the blockchain, it is an internal economic incentive for the computing power that blockchain represents.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in