Barbie wins catfight with Bratz
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.In a battle between Barbie and the Bratz gang of dolls, the long-legged blonde might not seem a match for the street attitude of her upstart rivals, but last night she won the biggest catfight in toyland.
Barbie's maker, Mattel, won a court case against MGA Entertainment, the manufacturer of the Bratz, in which hundreds of millions of dollars of past and future revenues are at stake.
A nine-member federal jury in California found that the creator of the multi-ethnic Bratz gang, 39-year-old Carter Bryant, created their characters and the name while he was under contract as a Barbie designer at Mattel.
The court heard how, in the pursuit of truth, Mattel sought forensic analysis of the earliest sketches of the Bratz and at one point put a private detective on to one of its own executives suspected of being in cahoots with MGA. The decision put Mattel in a commanding position going into the damages phase of the trial, which begins on 23 July.
The jury also found that MGA's chief executive, Isaac Larian, had interfered with Mattel's contractual relationship with Bryant and that both he and his company were liable for "conversion", the term used for industrial theft.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments