Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Atheist seeking US citizenship sues to remove 'So Help Me God' from oath

The French national claims the words breaches the Bill of Rights

Andrew Buncombe
New York
Tuesday 14 November 2017 15:46 GMT
Comments
Ms Perrier-Bilbo claims what is being asked of her is against the US Constitution
Ms Perrier-Bilbo claims what is being asked of her is against the US Constitution (GettyPerrier-Bilbo,)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A French woman seeking to become a US citizen, has filed a lawsuit to remove the phrase “So help me God” from the oath of citizenship because she is an atheist.

Olga Paule Perrier-Bilbo, 48, a French national and green card holder, has been living in Scituate, Massachusetts, since 2000. She is determined to forego her French citizenship and instead became an American, but claims the oath she needs to swear violates the US constitution.

“By its very nature, an oath that concludes ‘so help me God’ is asserting that God exists,” reads her lawsuit, filed before a federal court in Massachusetts.

“Accordingly, the current oath violates the first ten words of the Bill of Rights, and to participate in a ceremony which violates that key portion of the United States Constitution is not supporting or defending the Constitution as the oath demands.”

Donald Trump's immigration crackdown encapsulated in poignant footage of father being deported

The ten words she refers to in the lawsuit against the US Congress state that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”.

MassLive.Com said Ms Perrier-Bilbo was offered the chance to use a modified oath or participate in a private citizenship ceremony. However, she has claimed the mere presence of the words represent an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion. She has said the alternatives offered to her by the government place an illegal burden on her for her beliefs, it said.

One of Ms Perrier-Bilbo’s lawyers is Michael Newdow, who in 2000 failed when he sued his child’s school district to remove the words “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.

He also filed unsuccessful lawsuits to remove the phrase “In God We Trust” from American currency and prevent “So help me God” from being included in the Presidential oath of office.

Neither of Ms Perrier-Bilbo’s two lawyers were immediately available for comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in