America's pledge of allegiance in schools ruled out
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federal court sparked a massive debate across the United States yesterday by ruling that to ask schoolchildren to recite the pledge of allegiance swearing loyalty to "one nation under God" was unconstitutional.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in California said asking children to swear such a pledge was the same as asking them to swear allegiance to a nation "under Zeus" or "under Vishnu". The 2-1 decision said it undermined the basic tenet of the constitution that demands a separation of church and state.
Judge Alfred Goodwin said: "The text of the official pledge, codified in federal law, impermissibly takes a position with respect to the purely religious question of the existence and identity of God."
The ruling provoked fierce protests from Republicans and Democrats. George Bush's spokesman said the President considered the ruling ridiculous, and he added: "The Justice Department is looking how to seek redress."
The pledge, written in 1892, was first codified by Congress in 1942 as a patriotic statement that has been recited by generations of US schoolchildren as the first act of the school day. In 1954, Congress amended the official version of the pledge to add the words "under God".
Yesterday's ruling came as the appeal court overturned a lower court decision that dismissed a case against the pledge brought by the father of a schoolgirl from Sacramento. Michael Newdow, an atheist, said that while his daughter was not required to join classmates in reciting the pledge, she was nevertheless hurt by being compelled to "watch and listen as her state-employed teacher in her state-run school leads her classmates in a ritual proclaiming that there is a God".
Professor Vikram Amar, of the University of California's Hastings College of Law, said: "If [the ruling] survives and really does mean what it says, then arguably it could call into question a lot of other practices that we take for granted. I think there is a very good chance that the Supreme Court will be interested in this one."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments