Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Alabama abortion law: Federal judge blocks near-total ban on terminations

Doctors who terminate pregnancies could be sentenced to up to 99 years in prison under the law

Alex Woodward
New York
Tuesday 29 October 2019 12:29 GMT
Comments
Protesters in Georgia rally against the state's restrictive abortion legislation. Several federal court judges have ruled against similar measures in other states.
Protesters in Georgia rally against the state's restrictive abortion legislation. Several federal court judges have ruled against similar measures in other states. (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A federal judge has blocked an Alabama law that could punish abortion providers with a prison sentence of at least 10 years.

US District Judge Myron Thompson issued a preliminary injunction against the law, which would have made it virtually impossible to terminate a pregnancy in the state.

Alabama politicians approved the measure earlier this year, joining several states' efforts to pass similarly strict legislation aimed at challenging abortion laws at the US Supreme Court.

The law would create a near-total ban on abortions by making it a felony for doctors to perform them. It only allowed for abortions to be performed if the pregnancy posed a "serious" risk to a woman's health. It does not make exceptions for pregnancies that resulted from rape or incest.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Alabama and Planned Parenthood Federation of Alabama joined the lawsuit challenging the law. It was set to go into effect next month.

Alabama is among a dozen states attempting near-total bans on terminating pregnancies through state legislation that Republicans hope will be challenged by the high court, now comprised of a conservative majority seemingly primed to overturn the landmark 1973 decision in Roe v Wade, which affirms a woman's access to abortion without government interference.

But judges in lower courts across the US have denied those states' attempts by blocking their implementation.

The Supreme Court has agreed to review a Louisiana law that requires doctors to have admitting privileges to nearby hospitals, which severely limits access to abortions.

Louisiana and several other states have also authored so-called "heartbeat" bills that ban the procedure when a flicker of embryonic cardiac activity is detected, which can be discovered as early as six weeks into a pregnancy.

In May, a federal judge blocked a similar Mississippi law. Last month, a federal judge blocked another "heartbeat" bill in Georgia.

In his ruling, US District Court Judge Steve C Jones said that “under no circumstances whatsoever may a state prohibit or ban abortions at any point prior to viability."

In July, a federal judge blocked three anti-abortion measures from going into effect in Arkansas.

Following the Alabama decision, the ACLU told politicians to "listen closely".

Independent Minds Events: get involved in the news agenda

"We have a constitutional right to abortion", the group said in a statement. "If you try to ban it, we will see you in court."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in