Abortion ban: Federal judge permanently blocks controversial ‘heartbeat’ bill in Georgia
The law, which never went into effect, was seen as one of the most restrictive of its kind throughout the US
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A federal judge in Georgia has permanently blocked a controversial abortion bill that would have banned abortions in the state when a “detectable human heartbeat” became present, ruling on Monday the law violated constitutional privacy rights.
Judge Steve Jones ruled against the state in a lawsuit filed by abortion providers and an advocacy group. The judge had temporarily blocked the law in October, and it never went into effect.
The new ruling permanently enjoins the state from ever enforcing House Bill 481.
Cardiac activity can be detected by ultrasound as early as six weeks into a pregnancy, before many women realize they’re pregnant, according to a legal challenge.
Both the state and those challenging the law asked Jones to rule without a trial, saying there were no disputed facts. Judge Jones granted the challengers’ motions for summary judgment and denied the state’s motions, finding the law violated the 14th Amendment.
“HB 481 violates the constitutional right to privacy which, in turn, inflicts per se irreparable harm on plaintiffs", the judge wrote in a 67-page order.
US Supreme Court precedent has for nearly five decades held that states cannot ban abortion prior to the viability of a fetus, and since Georgia’s law does just that it is unconstitutional, the law’s opponents argued.
The state argued that the law promoted fetal well-being. It was widely considered as one of a number of attempts to create fresh legal challenged to abortion after two new conservative justices were confirmed to the Supreme Court.
The high court, by a 5-4 ruling on 29 June, struck down another of those challenges involving regulations from Louisiana.
Additional reporting by Associated Press
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments