$15bn Aids bill pushes for sexual abstinence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Supporters of President George Bush have forced the introduction of clauses insisting on a greater role for sexual abstinence into legislation that would massively increase the US contribution to the global fight against Aids.
The measure, which the Republican-dominated House passed and which must now be reconciled with a version due before the Senate next week, is essentially a compromise. Conservatives believed the $15bn (£9bn) five-year programme should place greater overriding emphasis on abstinence while Democrats sought to keep such controversial topics out of the bill, in the interests of getting the money to where it is needed as fast as possible.
In the end however, Congressman Tom Lantos, from California, the senior Democrat on the House International Relations Committee which wrote the bill, said he had no choice but to accept two amendments presented by conservatives.
One ensures that religious groups have access to funds, even if they disagree with clauses in the legislation providing for the greater use of condoms. The other stipulates that one-third of the funds should be used for promoting abstinence.
But Democrats accepted the amendments, arguing that they did not contradict the guiding "ABC" principle behind the measure. It was modelled on a policy applied with some success in Uganda, which listed the three goals of "abstinence, being faithful and condoms".
The Bush adminstration's Office of National Aids Policy said the funds would go towards improving healthcare infrastructures, including laboratories, specialised doctors and nurses. Critics said the money was being shifted from existing programmes, and would not aid poorer countries in central Europe and Asia.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments