Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Zimbabwe rejected by Commonwealth human rights body

Alex Duval Smith
Tuesday 16 November 1999 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Zimbabwe, the bad pupil of this year's Commonwealth summit, was thrown off the committee that polices human rights in the 54-nation body yesterday. But undemocratic and oppressive regimes won a reprieve when the conference failed to agree on concrete ways to clamp down on human-rights abuses.

Zimbabwe, the bad pupil of this year's Commonwealth summit, was thrown off the committee that polices human rights in the 54-nation body yesterday. But undemocratic and oppressive regimes won a reprieve when the conference failed to agree on concrete ways to clamp down on human-rights abuses.

At the end of the biennial Commonwealth conference, during which Zimbabwe's President, Robert Mugabe, accused Britain of being run by "gay gangsters", his country lost its chairmanship and its membership of the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (C-Mag), which is made up of eight Foreign Ministers, including Robin Cook of Britain.

The Commonwealth failed to establish an expanded remit that would have allowed the action group to put pressure on member states to respect political freedoms, the media and the judiciary. Despite the lack of progress on human rights, the heads of government pledged to lead the fight against the "global emergency" caused by the spread of HIV/Aids.

While Mr Cook talked up the achievements of the conference in expanding C-Mag's remit on human rights, diplomats and Commonwealth officials were less effusive.

Emeka Anyaoku, the group's outgoing secretary general, said that while there was no rejection of the proposal to expand the group's role, the idea would be referred to a new 10-nation body, including Zimbabwe, charged with preparing a document on "the challenges of the new century", for presentation at the next meeting of Commonwealth heads of government, in Canberra, Australia, in 2001.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in