Oscar Pistorius sentencing: Olympic star must serve 10 years, prosecutor urges
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The chief prosecutor in the Oscar Pistorius trial urged the judge on Friday to send the Olympic athlete to prison for at least 10 years, calling it the minimum acceptable term and noting the horrific nature of the shooting of Reeva Steenkamp.
Judge Thokozile Masipa is expected to announce Pistorius’s sentence on Tuesday. She adjourned court yesterday after chief prosecutor Gerrie Nel and chief defence lawyer Barry Roux presented their final arguments for sentencing, summing up the testimony in the week-long hearing.
Judge Masipa found Pistorius guilty last month of culpable homicide for negligently killing Ms Steenkamp, but acquitted him of murder.
Culpable homicide is comparable to manslaughter and the judge has a wide range of sentencing options. She could issue a suspended jail sentence and a fine, order the 27-year-old Paralympic champion to go under house arrest, or send him to prison for up to 15 years.
Mr Nel said to Judge Masipa: “The minimum term that society will be happy with is 10 years in prison.”
It was the first time prosecutors have said what sentence they are seeking. Mr Nel added: “This is a serious matter. The negligence borders on intent.”
Mr Roux said Pistorius did not act with any “deviousness” when he killed Ms Steenkamp, and acted while feeling extremely vulnerable and anxious. Pistorius testified he mistook Ms Steenkamp for a dangerous intruder in his home and claimed the shooting was a tragic accident.
Mr Roux described Pistorius’s suffering, both emotional and financial, since the shooting. “He’s lost everything. He was an icon in the eyes of South Africans,” Mr Roux said of the athlete.
AP
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments