Egyptian court blocks al-Sisi's government from giving away two islands to Saudi Arabia
'It is Egyptian land and cannot be given up according to the Egyptian constitution'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An Egyptian court has rejected a government plan to transfer two uninhabited Red Sea islands to Saudi Arabia, in a final ruling that prompted cheers in the courtroom but could deepen tensions with the country's erstwhile financial backer. Egypt's government had announced in April, during a visit by the Saudi king, a maritime demarcation accord that would mean it cedes control of Tiran and Sanafir. The deal prompted protests from Egyptians who said they had been taught in school that the islands belonged to them.
It has become a source of tension between Egypt and Saudi Arabia, which has showered its ally with tens of billions of dollars in aid in recent years but suspended petroleum supplies in September amid growing differences. The court's decision was based on “irrefutable evidence” as well as local and international practices which removed any doubt that the islands belonged to Egypt alone, state news agency MENA said.
Two leading human rights lawyers had challenged the demarcation accord in Egypt’s administrative court system, which deals with cases involving the government and public entities. One of them, Khaled Ali, called the verdict a “decisive” ruling. “So it is not permissible for the president, or prime minister or parliament or cabinet or a referendum to give up this land,” Ali said. “It is Egyptian land and cannot be given up according to the Egyptian constitution.”
The lawyers won an initial ruling in June, but the government appealed, sending the case to the Higher Administrative Court which sits atop the administrative judicial ladder.
Celebrations erupted as the judge read out the ruling, with jubilant supporters carrying Ali and his colleague Malek Adly out of the courtroom.
Hundreds of people outside waved Egyptian flags chanted "Egyptian, Egyptian" and "Bread, Freedom, the islands are Egyptian".
"This verdict is a victory for Egypt," Adly said.
There was no immediate response from the government. Saudi and Egyptian officials had argued that the islands belonged to Saudi Arabia and were only under Egyptian control because Riyadh asked Cairo in 1950 to protect them.
But the lawyers who opposed the accord said Egypt's sovereignty over the islands dated back to a treaty in 1906, before Saudi Arabia was founded.
Reuters
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments