Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

1960: 'wind of change' that created a storm

Richard Dowden
Tuesday 20 September 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ANYONE reading Harold Macmillan's 'Wind of Change' speech, must wonder what all the fuss was about, writes Richard Dowden. In the most urbane and discreet language, with many references to not interfering in South African affairs, Mr Macmillan said that the British system was based on personal merit, not on race. He made no judgement on the South African system. The word apartheid did not pass his lips.

Nor was he announcing any new policy for Africa. As he said, the wind of change was blowing throughout the continent. Britain was shedding territories and colonies. Sudan had been independent for four years, Ghana for three years, the date set for Nigerian freedom. It was clear Britain was not going to back the white settlers in Kenya against the African population.

Yet Mr Macmillan's South African hosts were outraged, intepreting the speech as a coded attack on apartheid and a prediction that one day South Africa would be a multiracial democracy. Hendrik Verwoerd, the Prime Minister, spluttered out his reply complaining that his job was hard enough without a visiting British prime minister making it any harder.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in