Workers warned of spies in the office
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALL STAFF using computers should now assume that they are being monitored, a London conference on electronics and privacy was told yesterday.
Workplace surveillance techniques are on the increase, said Michael Ford, a barrister and visiting fellow at the London School of Economics.
Some employers use closed-circuit television, drug testing, interception of private mail and psychometric questionnaires, Mr Ford told the conference, organised by the research group Income Data Services (IDS).
In Britain, staff at telephone call centres were the subject of most scrutiny. In America, some firms tested potential employees for genetic defects which might predispose them to illnesses affecting their work.
Mr Ford said there was no fundamental right to privacy, but bosses must beware divulging confidential information.
Robert Pullen of IDS warned office workers to beware cracking jokes or making derogatory comments via internal e-mail.
Office humorists can infringe sex and race discrimination laws or find themselves accused of libel, he said. In one recent case the financial group Norwich Union paid pounds 450,000 to a rival firm because of allegedly defamatory internal e-mails.
Mr Pullen also gave warning that Internet users were increasingly open to litigation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments