Work of GM food scientist is flawed, say experts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOVERNMENT'S senior advisers on the safety of genetically modified food have dismissed as irrelevant and inconclusive the work of Arpad Pusztai, the scientist who caused a furore with his studies on GM potatoes.
The Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes (ACNFP) found Dr Pusztai's work is seriously flawed and could not be used to justify his comments in a television interview last year that the public are unwitting guinea pigs in a mass GM experiment.
A separate investigation by a panel of Britain's leading experts appointed by the Royal Society, which is due to be published today, is also expected to cast serious doubt over the claims made by Dr Pusztai and his supporters.
Professor Janet Bainbridge, who chairs the ACNFP, said that an inquiry into Dr Pusztai's experiments - in which he fed GM potatoes to rats - had failed to find any meaningful conclusions due to "serious doubts" over the way the study was designed.
She said last night: "We have concluded that the results from Dr Pusztai's work have been severely distorted by the recent media campaign in an unwarranted attempt to cast doubt on the safety of GM foods in general.
"The ACNFP is clear that these potatoes would never be approved for food use. Furthermore, if a company submitted data from such poorly designed studies to support an application, we would have no hesitation in rejecting it."
However, concern about GM food safety was expressed by the British Medical Association, which has called for a moratorium on the commercial planting of GM crops "until there is a scientific consensus on safety".
In a report that was due to be published later this week but was released early, the BMA suggested that it is not yet known whether there are any serious risks to the environment or human health.
Sir William Asscher, chairman of the BMA's board of science and education, said: "Once the GM genie is out of the bottle, the impact on the environment is likely to be irreversible."
The health implications of GM food are currently being reassessed by the government's Chief Medical Officer and Chief Scientist.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments