Woodwards deny fraud allegations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE ESTRANGED parents of the former au pair and convicted killer Louise Woodward appeared in court yesterdaycharged with dishonestly obtaining more than pounds 9,000 from their daughter's appeal fund.
Gary and Sue Woodward, both 43, denied the two charges brought under the 1968 Theft Act during the 20-minute hearing at Chester magistrates' court. It is alleged the couple submitted a false invoice for accommodation expenses incurred by Mrs Woodward while staying at the home of her daughter's American lawyer, Elaine Whitfield Sharp, during Woodward's trial for second- degree murder .
The prosecution claims the pounds 9,113.50 invoice was submitted to the Louise Woodward and Family Trust and the couple received a cheque for that amount.
On the request of defence lawyers, the case was adjourned until 13 October, when the Woodwards are due to be committed to Crown Court for trial.
Sue and Gary Woodward were both granted an extension of their unconditional bail.
Reporting restrictions were not lifted.
In November 1997, Woodward, then 19, was convicted by a jury in Boston, Massachusetts, of the second-degree murder of eight-month-old Matthew Eappen when he was in her care. The judge reduced the conviction to manslaughter and the sentence to 279 days, the time she had spent in custody awaiting trial.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments