Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Women more at risk from lung cancer

Cherry Norton Health Correspondent
Tuesday 20 April 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WOMEN SMOKERS are more at risk from lung cancer because they are genetically more susceptible to tobacco carcinogens, according to new research.

The findings, published today in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, showwomen are more likely to contract the main types of lung cancer than men at every level of exposure to cigarette smoke. "This gender difference cannot be explained by differences in baseline exposure, smoking history or body size; it is likely due to women's higher susceptibility to tobacco carcinogens," said the co-author of the study, Dr Stephen Lam, of the University of British Columbia, Canada.

Smoking causes about 120,000 deaths in the UK every year - or one in five of all deaths. The latest government figures show that in 1996 nearly 36,000 people died from lung cancer caused by smoking. The number of women dying this way has more than doubled in the past 23 years, from 6,961 in 1973 to 13,062 in 1996. There has been a decrease in male victims during the same period, from 29,463 to 22,852.

Previous British research has shown that nearly twice as many women as men under 65 are diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer, the most dangerous form of the disease. Experts believed that the differences between men and women could be explained by women smoking in a different way to men, taking shorter, sharper inhalations or inhaling more deeply because they are more likely to buy "light" cigarettes. However, the new research shows the outer lung cells of women are more susceptible to tobacco carcinogens.

Dr Mike Pearson, a spokesman for the British Thoracic Society, said: "This is another step to understanding the gender differences. There is definitely a genetic factor involved because only a proportion of men and women who smoke are susceptible to cancer. It is perfectly possible this genetic factor can also explain some of the differences between the sexes. Women's lungs are also smaller, which means they get more particle deposits."

The study of 400 men and women who had been smoking a pack a day for 20 years also found that the traditional way lung cancer is detected, by measuring breathing difficulty, was not suitable for women. The findings showed women developed more cancers in the outer parts of the lung, which does not have such an effect on breathing ability, while men were more likely to develop cancer in the large central airways.

t Scientists have solved one of the dilemmas in treating prostate cancer: when to operate. Researchers from Stanford University have devised a method of predicting which patients are likely to respond well to surgery and which ones are better off seeking alternative treatments.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in