Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Wimbledon's concrete mix

James Cusick
Monday 26 June 1995 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"They've concreted Wimbledon. My God, what have they done?" The cry of despair on the first day of the championships was heard more than once yesterday as fans faced the prospect of lawnless tennis amid a theme-park fantasy, writes James Cusick.

Green-painted concrete, hanging baskets of flowers against concrete walls, geometric concrete fountains, and railway-arch style hospitality suites are part of the All England Club's attempt to camouflage the building site that will become a pounds 100m new stadium. In the most expensive transformation of any sports arena in Britain, the new stadium will increase capacity from 7,000 to 11,000. In the meantime, the site resembles a concrete Shakespearean theatre-in-the-round with fake grass, fake fences and fake tenting. The corporate hospitality-takers look out on 420 tons of rolled top soil and concrete stairs leading nowhere.

Video monitors assured worried fans that all would be well by 1997. Those contemplating architectural criticism in the style of Prince Charles should hold off until then.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in