When sugar leaves a bitter taste
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nearly half of all claims that foods and drink are "sugar-free" are false, according to a survey published yesterday. One "sugar-free" product contained up to 26 grammes of sugar, according to the report by Action and Information on Sugars.
Many more offered misleading claims about their sugar content, or failed to provide legally required information about how much sugar was inside, the report's authors said.
The AIS is calling for a new legal definition of sugar to include fruit juices and concentrates, as well as tighter specifications for claims.
In particular, the organisation said consumers can be misled by labels saying a food is "low sugar", "diet" or has "no added sugar", with products that make the same claim containing different amounts of sugar. Products labelled "low sugar" contained 1.8g of sugar per 100g in the case of Ready Brek Cereal, but 16.9g in Liga rusks, the report said.
Safeway said it would examine claims that its "sugar-free" Instant Custard Powder contained 26g of sugar. The company said it was concerned by the allegations and insisted there had been no intention on its part to mislead customers.
Leading article, page 19
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments